Initially, the simple question of the day
is: “What’s so bad about trying to protect movies and music from being
pirated?” And, the simple answer is: “Nothing at all.”
But upon further examination, the next
and ultimately most important question is: “To what lengths will they
(studios and the record labels) go to accomplish their goals?” The
answer is also simple. They lobby for the passage of bills that would
give the government enough power to not only attempt to stop piracy and
fail, BUT while failing would also infringe on free speech, cost
millions of jobs and hamper innovation all at the same time. The
phrase “can’t see the forest for the trees” has never been so perfectly
matched with a real life situation.
The birth of SOPA and PIPA has been established through the efforts of the lobbying arms of the studios and labels The MPAA and RIAA. SOPA or (Stop Online Piracy Act) is in the Senate and PIPA, or (Protect Intellectual Property Act) is in the House. Both bills are essentially the ‘same wolf in sheep’s clothing’ so there is really no need to try and differentiate.
The birth of SOPA and PIPA has been established through the efforts of the lobbying arms of the studios and labels The MPAA and RIAA. SOPA or (Stop Online Piracy Act) is in the Senate and PIPA, or (Protect Intellectual Property Act) is in the House. Both bills are essentially the ‘same wolf in sheep’s clothing’ so there is really no need to try and differentiate.
If passed, SOPA and/or PIPA will give the
Justice Department the ability to shut down almost any blog or website
at will, PLUS it will also do absolutely nothing to stop those that
pirate movies or music.
Today the studios and labels rely on DMCA
take down notices to handle piracy on websites such as YouTube, Vimeo
and Facebook. The DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) allows the
website to take down the content within a specific period of time after
receiving a DMCA notice without penalty.
In most cases all of the companies
mentioned above do a fantastic job, and thus far have not done too much
complaining about the costs of implementing technology and resources for
a successful DMCA compliance structure. The studios and labels have a
much more difficult time with websites such as Piratebay.org or, what
the studios would call ‘Rogue’ websites, and it requires a little more
knowledge about the details of technology that drives such websites to
understand why they are such a complicated issue. Piratebay.org
doesn’t actually host any infringing content at all, but has millions of
links to content being hosted on peer or nodes. A peer, or node is a
personal computer connected to the internet with an open source
application based on BitTorrent open source code . BitTorrent allows a
person to host a file (movie, music, software etc). Those files are
made available for download using a torrent download application which
happens to be the same application that hosts the infringing files.
When someone downloads a file using a BitTorrent, they are actually
receiving that one file from multiple machines that are hosting the same
exact file using the same piece of software and then they are many
cases, making that file available to be downloaded from their machine
and the cycle begins. Those files could be hosted on machines that were
located in multiple countries and it is possible that the person hosting
the infringing file might not even know they are hosting it. Confusing
isn’t it? It is this confusion that it makes things more difficult and
more dangerous. Dangerous because, Piratebay.org doesn’t actually
host, deliver or infringe on any copyright at all. They only have links
to such content, because it shows up in their search engine in the same
way search result appear in Googles search engine however, under SOPA
and PIPA those sites can not only be prosecuted but shut down entirely
for the behavior of others they cannot control. It becomes easier to
understand why Google is so interested in SOPA and PIPA. If either act had been passed prior to Googles launch, we would all still be using Yahoo,
unless of course the Government hadn’t already shut them down too. The
same goes for YouTube and Facebook. What concerns free speech advocates
about these laws is even more frightening then losing access to Google.
If the government, and those behind government, didn’t like
Huffington Post or Breitbart.com it would now be legally plausible and
simple to shut them down. After all, Huffington Post editors at some
point in time have posted links to content from CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and
other organizations. These networks could now claim that the Huffington
Post was infringing upon their copyrights, and that Huffington editors,
under SOPA/PIPA, be charged for each offense and go to jail. Yes jail.“That would never happen” a friend of mine that works at a major studio told me. My response to him was simple. “I have never known a law that gives the government more power that they have not only used but exceeded the laws intent to gain even more power.”
I agree that piracy is a serious problem
and between 2001 and 2004 when I testified before Congress, we discussed
many solutions, none of which violate our First Amendment Right to Free
Speech. I have also worked as an executive at a major studio so I do
understand their issues as well however, passage of SOPA or PIPA will
essentially allow the Government to shut down the DNS (Domain Name
Server) that directed a URL such as www.google.com
or www.piratebay.org to the physical address of the server its IP
address such as (254.196.2.x). Domain names are simply a fancy and more
informative way for you to find a website since the data for a website
resides on a server somewhere and that server has a digital address
identified by something called an IP or (internet Protocol) address.
The Bills target the DNS servers that direct users from the URL name to
the IP address. For most users, shutting down an infringing DNS
address would prevent them from reaching the website that contained the
infringing content or the link to the infringing content. It would NOT
however stop the pirate from typing in IP address of (256.196.2.x) as an
example, to reach the same content. In short, it wouldn’t stop the
pirates from downloading illegal content any more than background checks
stop a gang member from purchasing a hand gun. Gang members don’t buy
guns legally and Pirates, hackers and criminals never open the legal
route either. It’s simply too messy and too easy to get caught. SOPA
and PIPA are dangerous, half-baked solutions that will cost millions of
jobs, stifle innovation and ultimately do nothing to stop piracy at
all. It could be used as a solution for those in Government that seek
to silence their opposition, even if that was never the intention.
Hollywood has many large donors that are huge contributors to Obama
so, even though Harry Reid postponed a vote on the bill, you can bet
that they will try to wait for the frenzy to calm down before voting on a
somewhat different version of the bill and most likely have a different
name than SOPA or PIPA. After all, those names are as about as
unpopular as members of Congress right now.
Karen Kotchar (contributed as an editor to this story).
http://www.forbes.com/sites/derekbroes/2012/01/20/why-should-you-fear-sopa-and-pipa/
No comments:
Post a Comment